Despicable Me 3 Movie Review

They already made four of these movies… But 2004 Incredibles will have its first sequel next year!

dm3-adv1sheet-rgb-5-58c818a68f809-1

Directed by Pierre Coffin (the Despicable Me franchise) and Kyle Balda (Lorax), Despicable Me 3 is the third feature-length movie about former villain Gru (Steve Carell) and the fourth feature-length movie of the franchise (Minions is the third).

After a failed mission, Felonious Gru has been removed from the Anti-Villain League Agency. Despite the attempts of comforting him by his wife Lucy Wilde (Kristen Wiig), he still feels purposeless… Then, an invitation from his long-lost brother Dru Gru (also Carell) changes his perspective on things. Now, he knows he is from a long line of supervillains. Out of this new knowledge, he faces the choice to go back to being evil or remain a good guy.

I remember when the first movie took the world by storm with its quirky slapstick humor and its adorable characters. I am happy to say that the humor is still present. Especially with animation, there is a tendency for the humor to decrease…sometimes exponentially (eg. Shrek Forever After). The slapstick is still funny, and the kids will love it.

I also appreciate how the filmmakers learned from their mistake regarding the Minions. You see, certain minor characters may shine even more than the stars themselves, but it only worked because they were presented in short bursts. Giving them a spin-off with the same shtick often results to a very boring product. Such was the case with Minions (2015). I’m happy to see that the Minions were not trying to hog the spotlight.

And that is where it ends, folks…

SPOILER ALERT

The positive I gave for the Minions was quickly removed because the Minions serve no purpose at all in the story. Remove all of the Minions scenes, and the story will still be exactly the same. Some might argue that the moment the Minions left their leader was one of the turning points in Gru’s “slump plot”. That is not the case. After having his hundreds of Minions leaving him, Gru never truly grieved about it…which was actually a bummer because we have seen the relationship between them (Gru knows them all by name, for example). But the movie never gave Gru a chance to digest what happened.

Also, the characters of Gru’s adoptive daughters were downplayed at an exponential rate! They did not really deliver something substantial to the plot.

Also, the basic conflict that could have been (Should I be good or bad?) was not addressed at all because it was not challenged or presented at all! When Dru asked his brother to be evil again, Gru accepted…not because he wants to be bad…but because he wants to prove to The Agency that he is still capable of doing something right. There was not a moment for him to ponder the situation he is in…which for me is such a wasted potential.

Despicable Me 3 has a poster that is very truthful…because it sums up what I felt after seeing this movie (look at the featured image again)… Though entertaining (especially to kids), it will not grow old well because of its unnecessary characters and a wasted huge potential for conflict. Once the kids who enjoyably watched this grows up, they will soon realize this is not as good as they remember it to be. This movie is…

GREAT GOOD BAD UGLY

Can We Still be Friends Movie Review

Can I still be friends with Star Cinema after watching this movie?

here-s-the-official-poster-for-can-we-still-be-friends-poster

Gerald Anderson and Arci Muñoz join forces for the second time in Can We Still Be Friends?

Directed by Prime Cruz and written by Jen Chuansu (the duo behind Sleepless), the movie shows the volatile relationship between Diego (Anderson) and Sam (Muñoz). After their break-up, the two former lovers seem to have a hard time coping with the loss. So they had an idea to remain friends (to be specific, roommates). Can they still be friends?

Let me first say what I like about this movie…

The chemistry between Anderson and Muñoz is undeniable. The kilig factor is real. It really feels like they have been partners for 8 years.

Arci Muñoz is the absolute star of this movie. Her acting is very impressive. One minute she is this very innocent, childlike, and charming woman; the next, she is a very mature and goal-oriented individual.

Also, I gotta give credit where credit is due. Gerald Anderson’s acting has improved…like a lot!

Juan Miguel Severo, the Spoken Word artist and the one who portrays Sam’s gay bestfriend JM, is effective, too. However, his character and the female bestfriend of Sam (sorry, forgot the name) could have easily been just one character.

I also like how the movie starts with Diego and Sam already in their 8th year. It is a welcome sight to watch a romance movie that is not set before the relationship.

And that is just about it…

SPOILER ALERT

First of all, the character of Diego is just sooooooooooo insanely insensitive to Sam (his girlfriend of 8 years) to such a degree that it is just really unrealistic.

Also, the very reason the two broke up is because of Diego’s immaturity and unwillingness to accept responsibility. But for some reason, the movie decides that Sam should be the one to make the move. She desperately (beeeeeeegginggggg) asked for him to come back. The one who gave the most is still the one who lost the most.

At the end of the day, they got together in very predictable fashion. And suddenly…POOF…Diego is now responsible and reliable. How did he turn into such a man? We don’t know. The movie never bothered to show us the progression of his character arc. Sam, on the other hand, had better characterization. She became a better person, and we saw that journey.

Also, the movie had a wedding vow (between JM and his husband) at its climax. The message basically says accept your partner for who he is because you love him. This apparently became the catalyst for Sam’s aforementioned beeeeeeeeg. NO!! I mean, it is true that you have to accept your partner for who he/she is, but if there is something that is needed to be corrected (ie. immaturity and a no-no attitude to obligations) he/she has to change!

Lastly and a bit nitpicky, there was a scene in the movie that has an obvious continuity error.

Can We Still Be Friends? has an amazing cast with good performances, but its unrealistic and predictable plot, followed by its insane message about love, its heartbreak, and its possible return, makes this ultimately…

GREAT GOOD BAD UGLY

The Mummy (2017) Movie Review

9 years since The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor, Universal Pictures aims to reestablish the OG of the Cinematic Universe, the Universal Monsters Universe, with a new name: the Dark Universe.

c8tvyd8voaain_p

Directed by Alex Kurtzman (co-wrote The Legend of Zorro and the reboot Star Trek franchise), The Mummy is the first of a series of remakes by Universal Pictures in hopes of establishing a cinematic universe revolving around monsters such as Dracula, the Frankenstein’s monster, the Invisible Man, and the Wolf Man. They already did this in the 1920s to 1950s  with great success.

This version, set in the present day, revolves around the character of Nick Morton (Tom Cruise), a former US military officer, who unearths the tomb of Princess Ahmanet (Sofia Boutella) and unknowingly placed a curse on himself. With the help of a shady organization called Prodigium, led by Dr. Henry Jekyll (Russell Crowe), Nick attempts to stop Princess Ahmanet’s plan to summon Set,the Egyptian god of death.

First of all, I looooooove the dedication Tom Cruise has for his movies. Watching his scenes in this movie proves that he still gives it all. At the age of 54, he still does his stunts! Sure, this is not as cool as him hanging on a plane’s door in Mission Impossible: Rogue Nation, but it is still astounding to know he pushes himself beyond his age. Nick Morton, his character, reminds me a lot of Mortal Kombat‘s Johnny Cage because Nick is very charismatic. Without a doubt, Tom Cruise is the biggest positive in this movie.

The set designs look cool! I had my eyes peeled when the Prodigium HQ was shown. true enough I saw hints of the Gill-Man (The Creature from the Black Lagoon) and a vampire skull.

There were Easter eggs to the Sommers Mummy franchise (the one with Brendan Fraser), too.

And that is where the positives end…

The story of this movie is messy and all over the place. If taken piece by piece, it is enjoyable and fun. That is true, especially the first scene. But if we are to look at the big picture, which we should to all movies, the viewers will realize that this movie could have been an easy trilogy. A lot of things are happening. Often, it happened in random ways. This movie had SIX writers, and it is pretty evident they had a hard time narrowing the story down.

Also, the character of Jenny Halsey (Annabelle Wallis) is completely forgettable and unnecessary. Besides being the damsel in distress and the bridge between Nick and the Prodigium, there is absolutely nothing she had offered as a character. Try to remove her in the story. Will we have the same story? Yes! Then, why include her?

Also, much of the humor in the movie does not work for me. Some of it was provided by Jake Johnson, who portrays Nick’s close friend Chris Vail. It felt too forced, and it strays away much to the supposedly feel of the movie. However, I like how the movie incorporates elements of horror in it, somehow resonating the 1932 original.

Lastly… and a bit nitpicky, I had issues looking at Sofia Boutella’s pre-final form (the one where she is Sofia Boutella but with a cracked nose and a cheek hole). The VFX on her face looks so plastic to me. I end up looking at the background everytime her pre-final form face shows up.

If it is what is about to come from Universal’s Dark Universe, The Mummy should be a warning to viewers to be cautious on the next installments (The Bride of Frankenstein will premiere on 2019). Despite the charismatic Tom Cruise in the lead, its disorganized plot has led me to conclude that this film is…

GREAT GOOD BAD UGLY

Wonder Woman Film Review

The last time a female superhero starred in a movie was 2005, and that was Elektra… Am I nervous? Yes… Am I excited to see Gal Gadot though? Hell yeah!

wwposter5

Female superhero movies have not been kind to us. The last one, Jennifer Garner’s Elektra, was in 2005 and has been one of the worst Marvel movies ever. A year before that, we had Halle Berry’s Catwoman, which was one of the worst DC movies ever. So despite the announcement of a film about THE ultimate superheroine, I was hesitant.

Directed by Patty Jenkins and starring Gal Gadot, the film centers around Diana (Gadot), princess of Themiscyra, a hidden island populated by Amazons and led by Queen Hippolyta (Connie Nielsen). After saving American pilot Steve Trevor (Chris Pine) from crash landing, she gets exposed to the bloody reality of World War I. Thinking that Ares, the God of War, is behind all of this, Diana leads Trevor back to London and hunts Ares, whose death would stop all the hate and fear of the Great War…she believes.

Gal Gadot delivers as Princess Diana. Just one look at her and you’ll agree that she is truly a princess. Her portrayal in this film is much more naive and innocent compared to her previous portrayal. This is totally different from her firm and worn-out character in Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Once the action starts, she reminds us how we liked every second of her in BvS. It is very obvious, however, that she still needs to train her acting skills. There were key emotional moments in the film which did not hit its mark because she can’t deliver the emotions.

The film is so different in style compared to the other three DCEU films. The humor is much more natural. It does not feel forced (Suicide Squad) or too out of place (BvS). Much of the humor is provided by Chris Pine and Lucy Davis, who portrays Trevor’s secretary Etta Candy. The shots are definitely more colorful than the other films. One look at Themiscyra and you will agree that it is indeed a Paradise Island.

I also love how they revealed Wonder Woman’s costume. They teased the costume multiple times, but when it was time to show it…BOOM! I was actually trying to reach out to Gal Gadot… It feels like the time I watched 2014 Godzilla.

The action pieces were also amazing to watch. There were three big action sequences and a few smaller ones scattered around the film. It felt raw, powerful, yet graceful at the same time. However, it has too much slow-mo. It came to the point that I was reminded of 2014 The Legend of Hercules, a movie with horrible and lazy use of slow-mo.

I also like the easter eggs and shoutout to past DC films/properties. My personal favorite was the 1978 Superman reference.

Though a lot of people I know (and reviews I read) does not like the last part where it centered on love (as a theme), I personally like it. In fact, I cried when Wonder Woman had a short speech on how love is the only cure for the problems of mankind. It is a heartwarming callback to creator William Moulton Marston’s original idea for the character. After playing a lot of Injustice and Injustice 2, it is such a pleasure to see a loving Diana again.

However, much like the three DCEU films that preceded it, this film still has a problem regarding pacing. If the MCU has a problem with its villains and, as of late, overuse of its humor, DCEU seems to have a problem with its pacing. I understand it is an origin story, but some scenes could have been cut short (not removed, to be clear). The film could have been 20 minutes shorter.

Also, though I said it was an MCU problem, the antagonists of the film is too underdeveloped. Screen time is at a low for the bad guys. Thus, it gave us little to nothing to understand their motivation. We simply know that they are…evil.

SPOILER ALERT

Lastly, I do now know if it was a coincidence or purposefully done, but a blonde soldier named Steve riding a dangerous plane that could destroy a city/country and sacrificing himself in the process sounds too Captain America: The First Avenger to me.

Wonder Woman is a film that exceeded expectations. It brought the DCEU back to its knees. Though it still has the ever-present pacing issues, this film is truly the best DCEU film so far. Justice League has a lot to live up to…because Wonder Woman is indeed…

GREAT GOOD BAD UGLY

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales Movie Review

“The worst pirate we’ve heard of” returns in the fifth installment of the franchise.

17015800_10154981836668830_529268610073059017_o

If The Fast and the Furious can get 8 movies, then Pirates of the Caribbean can do so as well. In its latest addition to the franchise, Johnny Depp and Geoffrey Rush welcome new characters portrayed by Javier Bardem, Brenton Thwaites, and Kaya Scodelario.

Five years after On Stranger Tides, Captain Jack Sparrow is down on his luck; he lost his crew, his ship, and a sense of purpose. Imprisoned, he meets Henry Turner (Thwaites), the son of William Turner (Orlando Bloom), who asks for his assistance in retrieving the Trident of Poseidon and informs him that Captain Salazar (Bardem) and his cursed Spanish crew are coming their way to kill him. With the help of the intelligent Carina Smyth (Scodelario) and Jack’s old pirate crew, they sail away in search of the infamous artifact.

Though this is the first movie in the franchise not to feature Hans Zimmer’s music, the soundtrack is still beautiful to listen to. The main theme still has remnants of the past theme, yet it is still fresh.

Both Thwaites and Scodelario are effective as solo characters. Their own character arcs are well-motivated and relatable. Their romance sub-plot, however, feels forced and is just a bootleg version of Will Turner-Elizabeth Swann.

Captain Salazar has the motivation of almost all Pirates bad guys, but Bardem manages to make it feel personal. His Captain Ahab-level obsession to kill Sparrow has lead to his demises (yeah, plural). There were time when I had a hard time understanding him though.

Johnny Depp has portrayed the character for over 14 years (sometimes in Disneyland). Evident in the latter movies, Jack Sparrow walks in a very thin line of being a parody or caricature of himself. The Curse of the Black Pearl portrayal has always been my favorite.

The story in itself is nothing new. Change a few character names and artifact names here and there, and you soon realize you’re basically watching the same thing.

SPOILER ALERT

However, the scene between Barbossa (Rush) and Carina, who was revealed to be her long lost daughter, is completely surprising and emotional…or maybe I have a soft spot for father scenes/stories.

Also, despite appearing to be the last movie in the franchise, the post-credits scene at the end tells us otherwise.

Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales features the same story with minute differences. Let us all hope that the next movie ends this franchise with a satisfying bang because Dead Men Tell No Tales is…

GREAT GOOD BAD UGLY

Bliss Movie Review

Jerrold Tarog delves into the bad side of dreams in his latest psycho-thriller…

 download

Along with the likes of Ian Veneracion and TJ Trinidad, Iza Calsado stars in Bliss, a psycho-thriller movie where everything seems uncertain.

Actress Jane Ciego (Calsado) stars as Abigail in her latest movie, Bliss. Due to a freak accident on set, she is left bedridden in a faraway house. Despite the attempts of her husband Carlo (TJ Trinidad) to calm her down, Jane becomes suspicious of her true condition in the house. Her creepy nurse Lilibeth (Adrienne Vergara) only increases her anxiety even more. As the movie progresses, twists, turns, and reveals only questioned the predicament she is in. Is everything real? Is it all a bad dream? Or is it something far worse?

The number one positive of the movie is its music. Thanks to director Tarog’s musical background, the music of the movie achieves in inserting suspense to the viewers’ minds. Once the music hits, you expect nasty things to come up.

Iza Calsado’s portrayal of Jane/Abigail is amazing. It is entertaining to watch her slow descent to madness.

But here we go…

The biggest issues I had with the movie are its slow pacing and poor storytelling.

This is a slowburn movie. And with slowburn movies, you got to have a big payoff. Examples of good slowburn movies are UnbreakableSplit, and Predestination. The pacing of these films are slow, but the rewards at the end make it all worth it…just like courting the love of your life. In Bliss, the so-called “payoff’ at the end weighs almost nothing due to the poor storytelling of the movie.

SPOILER ALERT

Even the best horror, psychological, or thriller films use the first minutes of its duration to set up the world of the story. Sometimes, the first act will take up a third of the story. This lets the viewers have a sense of the average life of the characters. So…when the suspense hits the fan (or in this case, the question of whether everything’s real or not), the viewers would be as scared/anxious/confused as the characters. But the viewers will never be scared/anxious/confused in this movie, because the movie constantly reminds you that it is all in Jane’s head! From Carlo’s scenes in the hospital to director Lexter Palao’s (Audie Gemora) interview with the Reporter (Michael de Mesa), nothing is a secret; nothing is a mystery… That Lexter interview alone is enough to spoon-feed the audience to obesity.

Also, some unnecessary scenes should have been deleted! Obiously, the Lexter interview has got to go! Also, the sub-plot between Carlo and Jane’s assistant (Stephanie Sol) only wasted my time. A lot of scenes/minutes were invested in this sub-plot, but no payoff at all!

Lastly (and a bit nitpicky) is how TJ Trinidad suddenly shifts to English in his dialogue. Good scenes/line deliveries ended anticlimactically due to the sudden shift in language. Maybe it is his way of saying it?

Watching the trailer of Bliss gave me a lot of hope and expectations, but it was all taken away. Even with good actors, the movie extremely suffered from its poor storytelling. Without a doubt, this is…

GREAT GOOD BAD UGLY

Luck at First Sight Movie Review

Luck and Fate play tag in director Dan Villegas’ latest rom-com flick.

luck-at-first-sight

Directed by Dan Villegas (Walang Forever and English Only, Please), this movie shows the first pairing of Jericho Rosales and Bela Padilla in a rom-com.

Joma (Rosales), a struggling gambler, is down on his luck. His neighbors demand him to pay his debts; he has no money; and bad luck seems to follow him. Desperate, he bought a green marble that will help him find his life charm. This leads him to meet Diane (Padilla), a woman who manages his sick father’s drugstore. Due to possibly luck, everytime Joma and Diane touch each other, good luck (particularly money) comes knocking. They used their good luck to win gambles and make money. There is only one rule though… If they want the good luck to continuously prosper, they should not fall in love with each other.

First, let me tell you about what I like about this movie. There is obvious chemistry between Jericho Rosales and Bela Padilla. Their interactions and “falling in love” scenes are cliche, true…But it still manages to be organic because of the movie’s two stars. Jericho Rosales has proved that even at his age (even joked at the film), he is still a heartthrob and a good partner to any star. Also, I love it when he acts like a desperate gambler. It is pitiful and pathetic at the same time.

The scene stealers of the show have to be Kate (Kim Molina) and Boggs (Cholo Baretto), who portrayed Diane’s cousin and Joma’s cousin, respectively. They provided most of the comic relief.

However, the movie suffers a lot of problems.

First, it is plagued with rom-com cliches. Even with a relatively new concept (life charm), the story depends heavily with methods used a hundred times in rom-coms. In fact, an equation such as “gambler with lots of debts+woman with sick father+life charm+rule about not falling in love=this movie” left little to the imagination. The story unraveled the way I expect it to be. Scenes went by the way I expect it to be. There was a formula, and the filmmakers followed it religiously.

BUT, the last scene of the movie may have went to a better ending (once you get to know the main characters), but sadly it decided to go to the comfortable ending. It was pretty much a downer for me.

SPOILER ALERT

Second, an established characteristic of Joma was thrown out the window in the last 30 minutes of the movie: his bad luck in gambling… It would not make sense for him to suddenly be that good in gambling. If he was that good in gambling, then he does not need Diane in the first place, and that would only contradict the very set-up of this movie. Though it lazily explains why (THE POWER OF LOVE), that only raises new questions! Why hasn’t Joma’s “love” for his family/abandoned home not enough to give him this amazing gambling skills? Does it have to be sexual love for it to work? It’s like that Frozen plothole again…

Lastly (though it is a bit nitpicky), Jeric Raval was underutilized in this movie. Instead of Thou Reyes, he could have been the film’s antagonist. I have to be clear though…Thou Reyes is actually an entertaining antagonist in this movie.

Luck at First Sight suffers from cliche, cliche, and most importantly cliche, and only the incredible chemistry of its actors managed to save this from being a bore and a cringe fest. This is…

GREAT GOOD BAD UGLY

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol.2 Film Review

In just two films, the GotG franchise has achieved what The Fast and the Furious has lazily attempted in eight: showcasing the value of family.

PHi3FGAu4Fkdlm_1_l

Director James Gunn attempts to recapture the surprising success of the first GotG film.  Chris Pratt, Zoe Saldana, Vin Diesel, Bradley Cooper, and Dave Bautista return as the core members, while Kurt Russell, Sylvester Stallone, and Pom Klementieff join in on the action.

After their victory against Ronan the Accuser, the Guardians of the Galaxy gained fame all around the…galaxy. After a conflict against the Sovereign, the Guardians meets the father of Peter Quill (Pratt), Ego the Living Planet (Russell), who has Mantis (Klementieff) as servant/company. As father and son bond for the first time in three decades, the rest of the Guardians discover something sinister in the shadows…

The very first scene of the film reminded me of the unsung character of the previous film: the soundtrack. As expected, the soundtrack of the film is fantastic. Most of the time, it is very retro, but very emotional in a few (more to that later).

James Gunn managed to juggle an ensemble of characters again. Each character had a time to shine (much more in a positive light compared to the first one). Further backstories were given to Gamora (Saldana), Nebula (Karen Gillan), Drax (Bautista), and Rocket (Cooper). I personally like the Drax-Mantis chemistry in the film. Most of the jokes I like were from scenes harnessing the energy of that tandem.

But without a doubt, the scene stealer of the film is Yondu Udonta (Michael Rooker). The character went such a huge development that his very first scene immediately made me watch him intensely. His relationship with Peter went deeper in this film.

Visually, GotG2 is one of the most colorful in the MCU franchise. It is vibrant to watch, and each world/ environment is designed well.

Also, the typical Marvel humor is present. I mean, if you need to show someone the typical Marvel humor, show GotG.

SPOILER ALERT

As written in the intro, GotG2 managed to tug at my heartstrings with the theme on fatherhood. Quill explores his relationship with his two dads: the biological (Ego) and the father figure (Yondu). And each relationship is both tragic when you think about it.

For me, this is the most emotionally gripping film in the entire MCU franchise…A surprise considering the negative comment I have for it…

However, it seems that the film sacrificed simple story structure to make room for the Marvel humor. The film had no BIG conflict until its last 30 minutes. Everything is just a series of unfortunate events that leads to the Guardians meeting Ego. Most of the action sequences are caused by the sub-plots that are scattered in the film. Let me be clear. It is funny and entertaining! But looking at it in an objective perspective takes a lot away…

Also, it infuriates me to see a few scenes with obvious green screen use. This is a BIG budget film, by the way.

Though the space/sky battles are good, the hand-to-hand action scenes are still too choppy. Every piece of movement gets cut! It makes it so hard to follow the action. HOLLYWOOD, learn from your Eastern brothers!

And another (though it’s super nitpick), the character of Adam Warlock is teased in a post-credit scene, but it totally ignores a former tease of the same character in Thor: The Dark World.

Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 is a fun and emotional ride but lacks the decent structure of its predecessor. Add the same problems it had in its first run (fight scenes). This film is…

GREAT GOOD BAD UGLY

The Fate of the Furious Film Review

A Russian submarine vs five cars… This franchise has truly went 180 degrees!

ff8-poster

Directed by F. Gary Gray (Straight Outta Compton), The Fate of the Furious (AKA The Fast and the Furious 8) is the latest installment to the FF movie franchise. At this point, having 8 movies in the span of 16 years might be too exhausting. But the latest addition to the franchise proves it still has a lot of fuel to burn.

During his honeymoon with his wife Letty (Michelle Rodriguez), Dom (Vin Diesel) gets recruited by top cyberterrorist Cipher (Charlize Theron), who has leverage against Dom. This causes Dom to betray his team. In a desperate attempt, intelligence operative Letty (Kurt Russell) recruits Luke (Dwayne Johnson) and Deckard Shaw (Jason Statham) to join the FF team.

I’m going to state the obvious (and the expected). The car scenes/chases/sequences in this film is beautiful. After 8 films,  it is heavily expected that it would be poetry in motion…like a perfect blend of demolition derby and ballet.

It is also amazing to see Vin Diesel grow as an actor. I am not saying he turned into Denzel Washington, but this is the most layered portrayal he has made so far.

Hearing Dwayne Johnson and Jason Statham banter each other apart is cool to watch. Filled with much testosterone, their scenes together are well-executed.

The chemistry between Scott Eastwood and Tyrese Gibson provides the comic relief in the film. Their interactions are similar to those buddy cop movies.

The cameos from past characters and new ones are also a welcome sight.

The entertainment value of this film is still surprisingly high. This is just visceral entertainment for you (much to the same effect as Schwarzenegger’s Commando). At first, I was extremely skeptical to FF’s turn to the action genre. Then, I found myself deeply questioning their physics-defying sequences, but the franchise has grown on me. The FF movies know what they are, and if you still demand a life-changing experience after watching this…then sorry for you.

However, the film still has problems that other FF movies have. The last act of the film wraps too conveniently…as if all the trouble and problems given were nothing all this time.

Also, though I admire the genre change, the FF movies as of late portray Dom similarly to another character of Vin Diesel: XXX. Just like the third XXX movie, this film portrays Dom as this one-man wrecking crew/army. Dom’s team repeatedly tells us how badass or how unstoppable he is. He is a racer! Add the fact that Dom is slowly being overshadowed by Luke Hobbs (and Deckard Shaw in the film’s climax), and you got “Red Ranger vs Green Ranger Effect”.

The Fate of the Furious only shows us that The Fast and the Furious franchise still has a lot of fuel left, but it still has the same problems. Only time will tell if the filmmakers will finally learn from this (two sequels and rumored spin-off movies are on the way). This film is…

GREAT GOOD BAD UGLY

Can’t Help Falling in Love Movie Review

The new movie of KathNiel is directed by the person who directed 2014’s Bride for Rent. I am very nervous……

Cant-Help-Poster-3-415x600

Directed by Mae Czarina Cruz-Alviar, Can’t Help Falling in Love is the latest addition to the KathNiel movie list.

Gab (Kathryn Bernardo) just got engaged from her boyfriend of six years, Jason (Matteo Guidicelli). Everything seems to be peachy until a letter claiming she is legally married to a stranger flips her world around. She decides to meet the stranger, Dos (Daniel Padilla), and persuades him to file for separation. But as they attempt to end their “marriage”, a relationship blossoms along the way.

First of all, what I like about the movie is that there truly is great chemistry between Kathryn and Daniel. It is to be expected from a showbiz couple with 5 previous movies and numerous shows in their history. Each kilig moment feels genuine and organic.

The filmmakers obviously utilized drones to take establishing shots, and it looks great. However, the quality of the video is obviously lower.

Most of the humor in the movie work well. However, some of them were cringy given how cliche and predictable the scenes/lines are.

And that brings me to one of my biggest problems with the movie. It is just predictable and cliched.

SPOILER ALERT

Of course, Dos and Gab being together is the desirable and predictable outcome, but I’m talking how the scenes would go and the lines would be delivered. Also, the filmmakers need to learn about subtlety. The movie went the A Walk to Remember route, but fails to deliver the plot twist well. It was so on the nose!

In line with this, there are key moments/scenes in the movie that could have benefited if there were no background music (ex. the parking lot scene).

Also, there was a sub-plot with a transgender character that is totally unnecessary.

Lastly, my biggest problem with the movie is the ultra unrealistic reaction of Dos when he learns about the marriage and his actions later on. Though the movie tried to justify it in a very half-baked manner (with only 15 minutes left), it is simply too hard to buy it. Then again, that one might just be me….

Can’t Help Falling in Love is a rom-com movie with genuine chemistry between its co-stars, but even that will not save it from its cliche story and worn out scenes. This is…

GREAT GOOD BAD UGLY